but since the supreme court is appointed by corrupt politicians that it's okay to buy off, it's okay for us to issue the opinions our sponsors are paid to appoint us to make. it's only fair that the 1% get their moneys worth from us, cause a billionai

Could be corrupted? There's no 'could be' about it.

Johns really been stepping it up lately 

Basically, Roberts is saying, "I'm a judge, and I know that money would corrupt me, but legislators? Naaaaah."

The chief justice's statement already implies that politicians are corrupted, and since the public perception of them is that politicians are generally corrupt, they can proceed with their corruption, while judges cannot.

IF I WAS CHIEF JUSTICE ROBERTS, I WOULD HAVE CHANGED THE COURSE OF HISTORY BY CHANGING MY NARRATIVE EVER SO SLIGHTLY, FROM: "A Judge's role differs from that of a politician. Unlike a politician, who is expected to be appropriately responsive to the pr

If only there was consistent legal logic between this decision and other recent decisions.

Woot Woot!

+ProMonarchyGenius is this why your a monarchist?

Great, now why don't they go and supply the same logic to congressmen, because it still effects a ton of lives.

So that ruling basically says; you're not allowed to buy a judge because that might influence the way they rule but buying a politician is okay because politicians only work for their supporters... are these judges fucking insane or just retarded?

seems they watched John Oliver's segment on Justice elections he did a few weeks ago.

Why are judges even being elected?

I'm still trying to figure out who if you offend someone and they hits you then can take you can take them to court. But if you don't pay you taxes because you don't like what they are using your hard earned money on you go to jail. Money can not be fr

it pisses me off that in the quote the judge is referred to as he and his, instead of a gender neutral term like they/their, cuz there are female judges too you know....

Dat echo

dat echo

Judicial integrity....yeah right. 

So they agree that its harmful to buy a judge but buying a president or senator is just fine & dandy eh. O_o

Judges uphold the law and therefore are impartial to it. The legislative branch makes the law and are suppose to be baised toward there constituents. Money is speech. IT is. Why else does everyone get mad? Because they have a strong voice!! The problem

301+six in a row

This is the sort of half-measure that just lets them say that they made it all okay.

Watch more Final Judgment here: https://www.youtube.com/playlist?list=PLTpcK80irdQirLg6szYbMjNsiHywSu8vG

We need to vote 3rd party, for someone like Bernie Sanders who's willing to change the system. And vote in Democrats and Independents that actually want to take care of the everyday American and help the middle class and poor achieve financial success.